‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg
Identifieur interne : 000C21 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000C20; suivant : 000C22‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg
Auteurs : Donald BloxhamSource :
- History [ 0018-2648 ] ; 2002-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Adjutant decimal files, Administrative division records, Administrative files, Administrative matters, Aggressive warfare, Alfried, Alfried krupp, American occupation, American zone, April, Assistant secretary, Bloxham, British policy, British zone, Chief prosecutors, Concentration camps, Continental nations, Control council, Crimes branch, Crimes executive, Crimes trials, Criminal activities, Donald bloxham, Elwyn, Elwyn jones, Elwyn jones papers, Erhard milch, Executive order, Final report, French authorities, Further trials, General correspondence, General thrust, German affairs, German crimes, German department, German industrialists, German policy, German soldiers, Hartley shawcross, Historical association, Historical context, Hjalmar schacht, Howard petersen, Ibid, Impossible peace, Industrialist, Interested parties, International trial, Jackson papers, Judge advocate department, July, Krupp, Krupp issue, London agreement, Lord chancellor, Memo, Morgenthau plan, Nara, Nazi party, Nuremberg, Nuremberg trial, Nuremberg trials, Occwc, Occwc programme, Omgus, Permanent secretary, Political disposition, Political opinion, Prem sargent, Priscilla dale jones, Programme, Royal warrant, Royal warrant trials, Second half, Second trial, Secret memo, Shawcross, Signature illegible, Sprecher papers, State department, Subsequent nuremberg proceedings, Subsequent trials, Telford taylor, Third reich, Trial programme, Tusa, Wartime british government.
Abstract
This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-229X.00213
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000C06
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000B49
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000A13
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000C22
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000C21
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title><author><name sortKey="Bloxham, Donald" sort="Bloxham, Donald" uniqKey="Bloxham D" first="Donald" last="Bloxham">Donald Bloxham</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1</idno><date when="2002" year="2002">2002</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-229X.00213</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000C06</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000C06</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000B49</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000A13</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000A13</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0018-2648:2002:Bloxham D:the:trial:that</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000C22</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000C21</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000C21</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg</title><author><name sortKey="Bloxham, Donald" sort="Bloxham, Donald" uniqKey="Bloxham D" first="Donald" last="Bloxham">Donald Bloxham</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Southampton</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">History</title><idno type="ISSN">0018-2648</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-229X</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2002-01">2002-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">87</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">285</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="41">41</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="60">60</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0018-2648</idno></series><idno type="istex">721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-229X.00213</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HIST213</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0018-2648</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjutant decimal files</term><term>Administrative division records</term><term>Administrative files</term><term>Administrative matters</term><term>Aggressive warfare</term><term>Alfried</term><term>Alfried krupp</term><term>American occupation</term><term>American zone</term><term>April</term><term>Assistant secretary</term><term>Bloxham</term><term>British policy</term><term>British zone</term><term>Chief prosecutors</term><term>Concentration camps</term><term>Continental nations</term><term>Control council</term><term>Crimes branch</term><term>Crimes executive</term><term>Crimes trials</term><term>Criminal activities</term><term>Donald bloxham</term><term>Elwyn</term><term>Elwyn jones</term><term>Elwyn jones papers</term><term>Erhard milch</term><term>Executive order</term><term>Final report</term><term>French authorities</term><term>Further trials</term><term>General correspondence</term><term>General thrust</term><term>German affairs</term><term>German crimes</term><term>German department</term><term>German industrialists</term><term>German policy</term><term>German soldiers</term><term>Hartley shawcross</term><term>Historical association</term><term>Historical context</term><term>Hjalmar schacht</term><term>Howard petersen</term><term>Ibid</term><term>Impossible peace</term><term>Industrialist</term><term>Interested parties</term><term>International trial</term><term>Jackson papers</term><term>Judge advocate department</term><term>July</term><term>Krupp</term><term>Krupp issue</term><term>London agreement</term><term>Lord chancellor</term><term>Memo</term><term>Morgenthau plan</term><term>Nara</term><term>Nazi party</term><term>Nuremberg</term><term>Nuremberg trial</term><term>Nuremberg trials</term><term>Occwc</term><term>Occwc programme</term><term>Omgus</term><term>Permanent secretary</term><term>Political disposition</term><term>Political opinion</term><term>Prem sargent</term><term>Priscilla dale jones</term><term>Programme</term><term>Royal warrant</term><term>Royal warrant trials</term><term>Second half</term><term>Second trial</term><term>Secret memo</term><term>Shawcross</term><term>Signature illegible</term><term>Sprecher papers</term><term>State department</term><term>Subsequent nuremberg proceedings</term><term>Subsequent trials</term><term>Telford taylor</term><term>Third reich</term><term>Trial programme</term><term>Tusa</term><term>Wartime british government</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This article examines the foreign policies of Britain and the United States in the contexts of the occupation of Germany and the growing cold war to explain the abortion of a proposed second international trial of major war criminals at Nuremberg. It then illustrates and explains why, while the American legal authorities attempted to reinforce the principles established at the trial of Hermann Göring et al. by further trials of major war criminals within their zone of occupation, the British looked only to try ‘lesser’ war criminals, and to phase out their punishment programme altogether.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Bloxham, Donald" sort="Bloxham, Donald" uniqKey="Bloxham D" first="Donald" last="Bloxham">Donald Bloxham</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C21 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000C21 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:721FBE3069351BBEFF1DECC46B137FEE15BE35D1
|texte= ‘The Trial That Never Was’: Why there was no Second International Trial of Major War Criminals at Nuremberg
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |